Re: GPL only usage of security.h

Previous message: jmjonesat_private: "RE: GPL only usage of security.h"
In reply to: Smalley, Stephen: "RE: GPL only usage of security.h"
Next in thread: Smalley, Stephen: "RE: GPL only usage of security.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

dawat_private

Smalley, Stephen wrote:
>I think that the concern is that the kernel developers may balk at
>accepting LSM into the mainstream kernel if it enables closed source
>security modules, [...]

Can we let them make this decision?  (I'm not sure we want to get in the
middle of this war unless we have to -- I'm worried this sort of issue
will only make us more enemies than allies.)

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module