Greg KH wrote: >I want to apologize for bringing this up so late in development of this >patch. I also should have warned some of the effected parties ahead of >time, before bringing it up. Crispin, Stephan, and James, I apologize. > Thanks, I appreciate that. >As for why bringing it up now? I've realized that if this patch is >accepted into the kernel it would weaken the licensing requirements of a >security module (in the open source sense) since the beginning of the >project. With the current talk on lkml about licenses in the kernel, >the addition of the MODULE_LICENSE macro and a list of acceptable > You mentioned the MODULE_LICENSE macro in some other mail, but I've never heard of it, and neither has google. Can you elaborate? Crispin -- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 24 2001 - 22:24:00 PDT