Re: Binary only module overview

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: GPL only usage of security.h"
In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

offerat_private

* frm crispinat_private "09/24/01 17:36:11 -0700" | sed '1,$s/^/* /'
*
* richard offer wrote:
* 
*> Whats technically to stop me writing a device driver that replaces the
*> exiting capable() code with my own implementation ? Likewise with
*> intercepting and replacing system calls ?
*> 
* It's an obscurity defense: make it difficult, and therefore unprofitable
* to do so ;-)

Must resist temptation to put forward old comment about obscurity :-)

* 
* Crispin
* 

richard.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Offer                     Technical Lead, Trust Technology, SGI
"Specialization is for insects"
_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module