Re: GPL only usage of security.h

Previous message: richard offer: "Re: Binary only module overview"
In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: GPL only usage of security.h"
Next in thread: Sandy Harris: "Re: GPL only usage of security.h"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

offerat_private

* frm gregat_private "09/24/01 22:39:24 -0700" | sed '1,$s/^/* /'
*
* On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 10:22:15PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
*> 
*> You mentioned the MODULE_LICENSE macro in some other mail, but I've 
*> never heard of it, and neither has google. Can you elaborate?
* 
* Take a look at module.h in the 2.4.10 kernel, and the comment there
* right before the MODULE_LICENSE definition, it explains why it exists.

I gave this a look over yesterday when you first mentioned it, it looks
useful for a wide variety of people. I'm always in favor of more
documentation...

* 
* greg k-h
* 

richard.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Offer                     Technical Lead, Trust Technology, SGI
"Specialization is for insects"
_______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module