On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:17:37PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: [snip] > That is not clear to me. I have been unable to find a definitive > reference that states that is the case. If so, it is problematic, > because then every user-land program that ever #include'd errno.h from > glibc is GPL'd, because glibc #include's errno.h, among other GPL'd > kernel header files. Are you sure you want to declare nearly all > proprietary Linux applications to be in violation of the GPL? AFAIK, the glibc (and most other libraries) are LGPL rather than GPL. [snip] /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall <taoat_private> /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 14:50:40 PDT