Re: Binary only module overview

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:26:58 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [Linux-security-module-commit] lsm tree change 1.220"

    On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:50:11PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > >a small note in it detailing this disagreement might be a nice thing to do.
    > >
    > Fair enough.  How about this:
    > 
    >    "This file is GPL. See the Linux Kernel's COPYING file for details.
    >    There is controversy over whether this permits you to write a module
    >    that #includes this file without placing your module under the GPL.
    >    Consult your lawyer for advice."
    
    That's acceptable to me.  I'll go add that to the tree.
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:32:31 PDT