Re: Binary only module overview

Previous message: James Morris: "[PATCH] skb set_owner_w hook"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Binary only module overview"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 01:09:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> GPL_EXPORT_SYM is coming, has been discussed and tentatively agreed upon
> so that we can for example have libraries of GPL code that are GPL module
> only usable, while still exporting clear interfaces for nonfree users when
> appropriate (eg device drivers)

So in your opinion, would making the LSM public functions use
GPL_EXPORT_SYM (when it is available) increase the odds of the patch
being accepted into the kernel?

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module