Re: Binary only module overview

From: Rik van Riel (rielat_private)
Date: Fri Sep 28 2001 - 20:37:33 PDT


On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 jmjonesat_private wrote:

> However, the way I understand copyright laws (admittedly "vague"): it
> is up to the copyright holder to defend his product, not anybody else.
> If Linus, or anybody else, wants to say "okay, I won't file suit
> against people who abuse me in this manner ... XYZ", that's his/her
> right.

But could he decide that for the code of one of the other
few-hundred copyright holders in the kernel ?

Note that even if Linus says he thinks something is ok,
people would still need to respect the rights of all the
other copyright holders to the kernel.

Interesting thing is that Richard Stallman never seemed
willing to take this leap and trust the GPL, but instead
requires people to sign over their copyright to the FSF
before code is accepted into a GNU project ;))

cheers,

Rik
-- 
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvarkat_private (spam digging piggy)


_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Sep 29 2001 - 11:18:50 PDT