Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 03:02:51PM -0700, richard offer wrote: > > > > I'd like to see a comment on the authoritative patch I sent last week. A > > comment other than "I don't like authoritative hooks so I'm not going to > > apply it". > > I don't like it, and I'm not going to apply it :) > > Come on, we've been over this before... Yes we have. We have presented the patch, as requested. We have successfully refutted the arguements that restrictive hooks coupled with whacked capabilities is sufficient. No one has proposed a resolution for the MAC/DAC ordering issue which does not involve authoritative hooks. You assert that restrictive hooks will be easier to sell than authoritative even though they are known to be insufficent for POSIX ACLs and NFSv4. In POSIX terms you are, as a reviewer, non-responsive. -- Casey Schaufler Manager, Trust Technology, SGI caseyat_private voice: 650.933.1634 casey_pat_private Pager: 888.220.0607 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 16:43:31 PDT