On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 06:10:05PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > To refresh everyone's memory, here is the notes from the August LSM BoF > http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/linux-security-module/2001-August/001663.html One further issue that was brought up in the BOF (at least, as reported by Crispin's notes :) was getting LSM back out, once the patch is accepted. Linus says no conditional compilation. I think we can all agree on this, particularly with as invasive a patch as we have now. Does anyone have ideas for the headers that will enable folks to compile out LSM if they want, while still being pretty? Are there other examples (devfs?) that we should model? And, do we need to have this elvel of readiness before submitting our patch? Cheers! ;) _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 05 2001 - 18:33:27 PDT