Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes

Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes"
In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: [PATCH] proposed documentation changes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

gregat_private

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:10:18AM -0700, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 09:32:32AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Any further thoughts about these proposed documentation changes?
> 
> I still don't like that an awful lot of parameter information is
> discarded.

As Seth just pointed out to me on irc (#kernelnewbies is somewhere a
number of people hang out in) there might be some confusion why I'm
pushing these changes.

The current format of the comments in security.h are not able to be used
by any documentation generating program.  I'm trying to modify them so
that kernel-doc can be used to generate documentation.  kernel-doc is
what is used to generate the rest of the kernel documentation, and we
should be consistent with that :)

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module