Re: [RFC] 2.4.11-pre4 patch

From: jmjonesat_private
Date: Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:20:45 PDT

  • Next message: Seth Arnold: "Re: [RFC] 2.4.11-pre4 patch"

    On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Chris Wright wrote:
    
    > * jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote:
    > > 
    > > Perhaps it would be more useful to discuss the division you have in
    > > mind...
    > 
    > all i'm advocating is splitting the patch submission...patch 1/4, 2/4,
    > 3/4, 4/4 or something like that.  each subsequent patch is relative to
    > the predecessor.  this is not too unusual, it is simply a way to take a
    > huge patch and break it down into human-readable chunks.
    
    Not to disagree with this strategy, but to ask what exactly WHAT will
    be submitted in each "fraction".  How does one divide a patch that has
    this complexity AND integrated, for review?
    
    
    > 
    > -chris
    > 
    
    J. Melvin Jones
    
    
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
    ||  Software Developer
    ||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
    ||  Network and Systems Administration
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    ||  http://www.jmjones.com/
    |>------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:21:28 PDT