On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Chris Wright wrote: > * jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote: > > > > Perhaps it would be more useful to discuss the division you have in > > mind... > > all i'm advocating is splitting the patch submission...patch 1/4, 2/4, > 3/4, 4/4 or something like that. each subsequent patch is relative to > the predecessor. this is not too unusual, it is simply a way to take a > huge patch and break it down into human-readable chunks. Not to disagree with this strategy, but to ask what exactly WHAT will be submitted in each "fraction". How does one divide a patch that has this complexity AND integrated, for review? > > -chris > J. Melvin Jones |>------------------------------------------------------ || J. MELVIN JONES jmjonesat_private |>------------------------------------------------------ || Microcomputer Systems Consultant || Software Developer || Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration || Network and Systems Administration |>------------------------------------------------------ || http://www.jmjones.com/ |>------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 16:21:28 PDT