Greg KH wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 11:12:33AM -0700, richard offer wrote:
>
>>@@ -968,8 +966,8 @@
>> up(&dir->i_zombie);
>> if (!error) {
>> inode_dir_notify(dir, DN_CREATE);
>>- security_ops->inode_ops->post_create(dir, dentry, mode);
>> }
>>+ security_ops->inode_ops->post_create(error, dir, dentry, mode);
>> return error;
>> }
>>
>>
>Is there any reason besides audit for this change?
>
This looks like Richard trying to make the hook authoritative. It was
widely agreed at the August BOF that we would switch to authoritative
hooks if SGI could overcome a few obstacles.
Is there any reason to object to this change besides "don't like
authoritative"?
Crispin
--
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc. http://wirex.com
Security Hardened Linux Distribution: http://immunix.org
Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 11:47:27 PDT