Re: Updated auth patch for 2.4.12

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Thu Oct 11 2001 - 12:22:42 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Updated auth patch for 2.4.12"

    On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 12:08:29PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    > No.  It was "authoritative if not too painful." There are cases where 
    > truly authoritative is painful, because the in-kernel logic short 
    > circiuts waaay early.  So it's "kinda authoritative as long as it 
    > doesn't proliferate hooks".
    
    But audit is still off the list for "phase 1", right?
    
    So if this hook is for audit use only, which I think Stephan just agreed
    with, I don't think it should be modified as such.
    
    greg k-h
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 12:31:23 PDT