* richard offer (offerat_private) wrote: > > > * frm chrisat_private "10/11/2001 02:40:17 PM -0700" | sed '1,$s/^/* /' > * > ** richard offer (offerat_private) wrote: > *> > *> > *> Attached is the auth patch updated for 2.4.12 (there was one conflict in > *> fs/attr.c) > * > * as stephen reminded me...DQUOT_TRANSFER needs to happen _after_ > * successfully passing lsm hook, so your change to fs/attr.c isn't > * completely right ;-/ > > Should this mean that there should be a new hook that would allow for a > module to implement a quota migration decision ? It seems that its > currently basing its decision on uids/gids only. no, it isn't access control. it's looking to see if uids/gids have changed (as part of the attribute change). if they have, then you transfer quota info to new uid/gid so they get charged for file usage. the change looks fine, btw. -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 11 2001 - 17:39:33 PDT