On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:41:37AM -0500, Trent Jaeger wrote: > [...] and we found that less than 20% of the LSM security hooks are > actually invoked by lmbench. [...] Wow. I had no idea that the coverage would be so slim with such a widely-respected benchmark. Thanks for looking at this. :) > For the time being we have pushed the coverage benchmark problem on the > stack. If any of you have any ideas, we would appreciate them. Trent, I tend to suggest kernel compiles as a macro benchmark: most folks know how a kernel compile ought to handle on their setup, and seeing a 0%, 1%, 5%, slowdown with a kernel compile is vaguely useful, at least for folks who spend their days compiling. :) If your testbed is setup to easily check coverage, I know I'd be curious to hear what percentage of LSM hooks are invoked with a kernel compile. :) Thanks :) -- The Bill of Rights: 7 out of 10 rights haven't been sold yet! Contact your congressman for details how *you* can buy one today! _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 09:09:30 PST