Is anyone still using the capabilty_ops directly instead of stacking with capability module? I don't think we need to export capability_ops and nproc_ops any longer. Thoughts/flames? -chris ===== security/capability.c 1.75 vs edited ===== --- 1.75/security/capability.c Tue Nov 6 00:19:18 2001 +++ edited/security/capability.c Wed Nov 7 11:28:21 2001 @@ -1331,7 +1331,5 @@ module_init (capability_init); module_exit (capability_exit); -EXPORT_SYMBOL (capability_ops); - MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Standard Linux Capabilities Security Module"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); ===== security/nproc.c 1.7 vs edited ===== --- 1.7/security/nproc.c Fri Nov 2 10:35:34 2001 +++ edited/security/nproc.c Wed Nov 7 11:28:41 2001 @@ -1180,8 +1180,6 @@ module_init (nproc_init); module_exit (nproc_exit); -EXPORT_SYMBOL(nproc_ops); - MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LSM implementation of the Openwall kernel patch adding RLIMIT_NPROC limitation to execve"); MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); ===== security/Makefile 1.10 vs edited ===== --- 1.10/security/Makefile Tue Nov 6 00:19:18 2001 +++ edited/security/Makefile Wed Nov 7 13:46:34 2001 @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_DTE) += dte # Objects that export symbols -export-objs := security.o capability.o nproc.o +export-objs := security.o # Object file lists obj-y := security.o dummy.o _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:33:37 PST