Is anyone still using the capabilty_ops directly instead of stacking
with capability module?
I don't think we need to export capability_ops and nproc_ops any longer.
Thoughts/flames?
-chris
===== security/capability.c 1.75 vs edited =====
--- 1.75/security/capability.c Tue Nov 6 00:19:18 2001
+++ edited/security/capability.c Wed Nov 7 11:28:21 2001
@@ -1331,7 +1331,5 @@
module_init (capability_init);
module_exit (capability_exit);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL (capability_ops);
-
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Standard Linux Capabilities Security Module");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
===== security/nproc.c 1.7 vs edited =====
--- 1.7/security/nproc.c Fri Nov 2 10:35:34 2001
+++ edited/security/nproc.c Wed Nov 7 11:28:41 2001
@@ -1180,8 +1180,6 @@
module_init (nproc_init);
module_exit (nproc_exit);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(nproc_ops);
-
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("LSM implementation of the Openwall kernel patch adding RLIMIT_NPROC limitation to execve");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
===== security/Makefile 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/security/Makefile Tue Nov 6 00:19:18 2001
+++ edited/security/Makefile Wed Nov 7 13:46:34 2001
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
subdir-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_DTE) += dte
# Objects that export symbols
-export-objs := security.o capability.o nproc.o
+export-objs := security.o
# Object file lists
obj-y := security.o dummy.o
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-module@wirex.com
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 07 2001 - 14:33:37 PST