Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Next in thread: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Reply: Chris Wright: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Reply: Seth Arnold: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jmjonesat_private

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Chris Wright wrote:

> it forces you to stack properly.  the export is leftover from before we
> handled any stacking, so it's legacy cruft.
> 
> -chris
> 

Forgive my ignorance: is "properly" within LSM context or based on the
kernel if LSM is not included?  Might not LSM-prior solutions rely on this
export?

J. Melvin Jones

|>------------------------------------------------------
||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
|>------------------------------------------------------
||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
||  Software Developer
||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
||  Network and Systems Administration
|>------------------------------------------------------
||  http://www.jmjones.com/
|>------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module