Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops

Previous message: jmjonesat_private: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
In reply to: Seth Arnold: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] no longer export capability_ops and nproc_ops"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jmjonesat_private

On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Seth Arnold wrote:

> A work in progress, such as LSM, typically owes no backwards or forwards
> compatibility to anyone, at either the source or binary level.

Then, what's all this stuff about backwards compatability to inherent
Linux Kernel security?  If we owe something, to whom do we owe it?

J. Melvin Jones

|>------------------------------------------------------
||  J. MELVIN JONES            jmjonesat_private 
|>------------------------------------------------------
||  Microcomputer Systems Consultant  
||  Software Developer
||  Web Site Design, Hosting, and Administration
||  Network and Systems Administration
|>------------------------------------------------------
||  http://www.jmjones.com/
|>------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module