On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 09:58:58AM -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > I was sort of hoping that the posting to lkml was going to > be a group effort, representing the efforts of all involved. > That is what you meant, right? That is what I meant. > No one seems to have voiced an objection to my suggestion > regarding the start of Phase II. That means everyone agrees, > doesn't it? Personally, I'm not even thinking of "Phase II" right now. We have no idea of how the LSM code will look like when (and if) it eventually ends up in the kernel. Odds are, it will look quite different from the current patch (unless we are _very_ lucky :) Because of this, I'm only focusing on the immediate task at hand, and not worrying about what LSM will look like, or support, after it gets accepted, that's just premature worrying and planning that will be for naught right now. Sure, I think we should consider authoritative hooks, and other types of changes in the future, but I'm not making any commitments right now. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Nov 08 2001 - 10:28:38 PST