* Serge E. Hallyn (hallynat_private) wrote: > This seems clean. It's how DTE is working at the moment, with post_addmount > being the main init workhorse. > > -serge > > Quoting Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private): > > > > I think that this is ok - the super_block alloc_security hook should just > > allocate the security blob and not be dependent on having any specific > > information about the super_block, like most of the other alloc_security > > hooks. The check_sb hook and post_addmount hooks can be used by the > > security module to perform access control and update state based on more > > information. to clarify. no need to add the set_security (or similar) hook in my second patch, right? i'll add the alloc/free changes only then. thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Dec 18 2001 - 19:48:19 PST