* Emily Ratliff (ratliffat_private) wrote: > Since there have been no objections to the hook, can it be applied and > committed? i see no immediate reason not to include this patch. do you think this hook is sufficient for SECURE_SHM? the shm_close() vm_op gets called during __exit_mm() (so we don't have to wait for parent in wait4), right? thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jan 15 2002 - 13:11:27 PST