Re: question about bprm_ops->alloc_security(&bprm)

Previous message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: question about bprm_ops-&gt;alloc_security(&amp;bprm) (fwd)"
In reply to: Huagang Xie: "Re: question about bprm_ops-&gt;alloc_security(&amp;bprm)"
Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: question about bprm_ops-&gt;alloc_security(&amp;bprm)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hallynat_private

> +	retval = security_ops->bprm_ops->post_alloc_security(&bprm);

Seems to me the hook is justified, except 'post_alloc_security' seems
misleading.  Perhaps bprm_ops->check_user_args(&bprm) or somesuch.
Otherwise my first interpretation would be that we're cleaning up
artifacts of alloc_security.

-serge
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module