Ok, back to 2.0pre6 again! On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Brian Hatch wrote: > > > > > Now, LIDS use a new version number for now it can compile under both 2.4 > > > and 2.5 . The new version number is "1.0.0pre1" for this first release, > > > and I will release the final "1.0.0" after it get stable. Actually, > > > during these days using, it is quite stable now. > > > > May I suggest to keep 2.x.x version numbers. > > That's *very* bad to have two different versions with the same version > > number! > > I was scratching my head at the 1.x choice too. 2.x make much > more sense. It's a completely different method of interacting > with the kernel (LSM), and as such it more than deserves it's > own major number. > > > -- > Brian Hatch I feel like I have a > Systems and tumor growing inside me. > Security Engineer You mean the one with a > http://www.ifokr.org/bri/ heartbeat? > Yeah, that one. > Every message PGP signed > -- LIDS secure linux kernel http://www.lids.org/ 1024D/B6EFB028 4731 2BF7 7735 4DBD 3771 4E24 B53B B60A B6EF B028 _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 06 2002 - 20:16:50 PST