Crispin Cowan wrote: > Your question is well taken. We even had a long discussion on the > question of keeping LSM hooks up to date WRT kernel evolution at the > first LSM BoF last summer. I was at the BoF at USENIX/Sec last summer, although about one hour late from attending another presentation. If this is the one, I must have missed that specific part. > WRT the "status of modules." Linux has a long-standing policy that > there is NO guarantee that modules will work across kernel versions. To > keep your module working between (say) Linux 2.6.17 and 2.6.18, you may > well have to hack the source to your module as well as re-compile. From your answer, as well as Chris', I deduce that, from a vendor's perspective, if you want to distribute a given kernel (standard or not), you must distribute everything else (modules) that corresponds to it. Makes sense. Thanks. Charles _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Apr 08 2002 - 14:41:35 PDT