Re: Maintaining LSM modules

From: Seth Arnold (sarnoldat_private)
Date: Tue Apr 16 2002 - 14:55:15 PDT

  • Next message: Steve Johnson: "Problem compiling lsm with 2.4.18 kernel" 

    On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:52:15PM -0700, Chris Wright wrote:
> I think this is useful, however it doesn't really generalize, does it?
> For modules that can be stacked, the current security_ops may not be
> the dummy stubs.

Yes, but calling the replaced functions in the event one doesn't want to
over-ride those functions may still be a legitimate thing to do.

-- 
UniNet InfoSec Conference   April 15-20   http://infosec.uninet.edu
    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Apr 16 2002 - 14:56:38 PDT