Re: handling exec_permission_lite

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: handling exec_permission_lite"
In reply to: Chris Wright: "Re: handling exec_permission_lite"
Next in thread: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: handling exec_permission_lite"
Reply: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: handling exec_permission_lite"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hallynat_private

> Indeed.  Just threw it out as something to ponder, really just an attempt
> to avoid adding new hooks ;-)

Well, if we're really worried about the mere number of hooks, we could
always add an argument to our own permission hook to request a fast_exec
check.  Or add an extra bit to the mask?  FAST_EXEC(16) as opposed to
MAY_EXEC(8)?

-serge
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module