Re: handling exec_permission_lite

From: Serge E. Hallyn (hallynat_private)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 14:30:09 PDT

  • Next message: Serge E. Hallyn: "Re: handling exec_permission_lite"

    > Indeed.  Just threw it out as something to ponder, really just an attempt
    > to avoid adding new hooks ;-)
    Well, if we're really worried about the mere number of hooks, we could
    always add an argument to our own permission hook to request a fast_exec
    check.  Or add an extra bit to the mask?  FAST_EXEC(16) as opposed to
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue May 07 2002 - 14:31:29 PDT