Re: SELinux to GPL or not to GPL

Previous message: Seth Arnold: "Re: SELinux to GPL or not to GPL"
In reply to: jmjonesat_private: "Re: SELinux to GPL or not to GPL"
Next in thread: forrest whitcher: "Re: SELinux to GPL or not to GPL"
Next in thread: Kurt Seifried: "Re: SELinux to GPL or not to GPL"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* jmjonesat_private (jmjonesat_private) wrote:
> 
> I still see no reason why this issue refers to the LSM interface.

It does not.  The licensing and patent issues associated with a
particular security policy implemented in a module are not related to
the LSM interface.

thanks,
-chris

-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module