On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Chris Wright wrote: > * Greg KH (gregat_private) wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 12:25:54AM +1000, James Morris wrote: > > > > > > If it looks ok to everyone, I'll start work on the 2.5 version. > > > > Does the kerneldoc tools work ok with the way things are now split up? > > > > I'm worried that we will have to include the whole large comment > > structure at the top of the structure for it to show up properly :( > > Heh, I was worried about the same thing. The patch actually does place > all comments above the security_operations structure, but not in a way > that kerneldoc can parse it. The patch below is relative to James' > patch and makes the thing (almost) kerneldoc parseable. I also removed > the tabs in the callback prototypes to be more consistent with other > parts of the kernel. Ok, I'll apply this patch and then start work on the 2.5 version. If nobody objects, I'd like to then push the changes through before any other changes to the trees. If there are any outstanding kerneldoc issues, we can address them relatively easily afterwards. - James -- James Morris <jmorrisat_private> _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 04 2002 - 21:33:24 PDT