On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Greg KH wrote: > I think we should initially not submit the network stuff at all. Then, > after the main lsm patch is in, add the network stuff as a separate > configuration option. I figure all the main battles will have taken > place by then, so we can just focus on the network issues. I feel that the entire LSM API needs to be put forward for discussion, and that we should be working with the core network developers from the start. I don't think the networking can be just dropped in as an afterthought. Why not just use separate patches -- if people don't want to look at the networking stuff, they don't have to. Also, we haven't had a request yet to make the network stuff separately configurable (a 0.3% hit on raw gigabit TCP bandwidth may be less of an issue than macroizing the code). - James -- James Morris <jmorrisat_private> _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Jul 11 2002 - 18:07:44 PDT