Re: New hooks for sock structure

From: Valdis.Kletnieksat_private
Date: Fri Jul 12 2002 - 06:05:10 PDT

  • Next message: James Morris: "Re: [PATCH] IP hook removal for 2.4"

    On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:08:29 +1000, James Morris said:
    
    > Note that there is some coverage of IPv6 (and all socket-based protocols) 
    > via the socket hooks.
    
    Thanks for the reminder there.  Actually reading the code, and comparing
    it to what's shown up on our needs list, the struct socket_security_ops
    pointers suffice for our needs - we *do* care if userid X is trying to
    do a connect() or accept() to an unapproved destination, but don't need
    much intervention in the input/output/forward stuff beyond what we already
    do with the command-line iptables.
    -- 
    				Valdis Kletnieks
    				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
    				Virginia Tech
    
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jul 12 2002 - 06:08:52 PDT