Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.27

Previous message: dwheelerat_private: "Updated stacker.c"
Next in thread: Greg KH: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.27"
Reply: Greg KH: "Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.27"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

alanat_private

On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 09:16, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > +		error = security_ops->inode_setattr(dentry, attr);
> 
> Am I the only one who'd like to see this as an inline function?
> 1. It can be optimized away.
> 2. It's easier to read.

You are not the only one. At the kernel summit there were discussions
about both wrapping the few performance impacting ones in ifdefs, and/or
using dynamic patching.

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module