Re: Got suggestions to reduce the locks in stacker.c?

From: James Morris (jmorrisat_private)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 23:22:57 PDT

  • Next message: Stephen Smalley: "Re: Why hooks in sys_iopl and sys_ioperm?"

    On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Chris Wright wrote:
    
    > * James Morris (jmorrisat_private) wrote:
    >
    > > Have a look at the use of can_unload as a way to control module deletion 
    > > (and there's an example in the ipv6 code).
    > 
    > This seems like a reasonable approach.  It allows an easy way for module
    > authors to give an unload/can't unload override switch.
    > 
    
    Implied here is that the LSM framework won't do this, it will be up to the 
    module authors to ensure their modules can't be unloaded.  I tend to agree 
    with this approach.
    
    
    - James
    -- 
    James Morris
    <jmorrisat_private>
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 23:24:37 PDT