Re: [PATCH] accessfs v0.6 ported to 2.5.35-lsm1 - 1/2

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Mon Sep 30 2002 - 01:22:00 PDT

  • Next message: Chris Wright: "Re: [RFC] LSM changes for 2.5.38"

    * James Morris (jmorrisat_private) wrote:
    > > 
    > > As for the ip_prot_sock hook in general, does it look ok to the other
    > > developers?
    > 
    > This hook is not necessary: any related access control decision can be
    > made via the more generic and flexible socket_bind() hook (like SELinux).
    
    Yes, I had the same impression.
    thanks,
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 01:30:25 PDT