* James Morris (jmorrisat_private) wrote: > > > > As for the ip_prot_sock hook in general, does it look ok to the other > > developers? > > This hook is not necessary: any related access control decision can be > made via the more generic and flexible socket_bind() hook (like SELinux). Yes, I had the same impression. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 01:30:25 PDT