On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:37:27PM -0700, Crispin Cowan wrote: > I would avoid mentioning the covert channel. We have explicitly avoided > providing any defense against covert channels. IMHO, it is hopeless to > re-factor Linux to the degree necessary to even come close to closing > covert channels. <snip> > This seems reasonable: appeal to the symmetry & completeness of hooking > both nice and affinity, and point out that neither is on a kernel fast-path. You do realize that lots of kernel programmers read this list, and that the archives are searchable? Any argument that you are going to try to make, that involves hiding information or discussions that you have had in public, aren't going to go very far :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 09 2002 - 20:15:31 PDT