setpriority, setpgid, [gs]etaffinity, sendfile, file_alloc_security

From: Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private)
Date: Fri Oct 11 2002 - 08:34:06 PDT

  • Next message: James Morris: "[PATCH][RFC] fix for ip_fragment() hook"

    Does anyone object to committing the revived hooks for setpriority and
    setpgid and the new hooks for [gs]etaffinity to the lsm-2.5 BitKeeper
    tree?  I'd prefer to have them in the tree even if we aren't submitting
    them to lkml right away.  Also, no one responded about sendfile and the
    file_permission hook.  Do we want to restore those hook calls to the
    lsm-2.5 BitKeeper tree or not?
    
    One other note:  I think we need to move the file_alloc_security hook
    call, as it presently occurs within a lock and cannot perform sleeping
    allocation.
    
    --
    Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs
    ssmalleyat_private
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 11 2002 - 08:35:19 PDT