Does anyone object to committing the revived hooks for setpriority and setpgid and the new hooks for [gs]etaffinity to the lsm-2.5 BitKeeper tree? I'd prefer to have them in the tree even if we aren't submitting them to lkml right away. Also, no one responded about sendfile and the file_permission hook. Do we want to restore those hook calls to the lsm-2.5 BitKeeper tree or not? One other note: I think we need to move the file_alloc_security hook call, as it presently occurs within a lock and cannot perform sleeping allocation. -- Stephen D. Smalley, NAI Labs ssmalleyat_private _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 11 2002 - 08:35:19 PDT