On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 05:07:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:28:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 01:10:37PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > > > I will not even look at the networking LSM bits until > > > CONFIG_SECURITY=n is available. BTW, there's another big issues with LSM: so far all those hook have no user in a mergeable shape. For all other additions there is a strong need to present something mergable but LSM doesn't. IMHO we should require a pointer to a module in mergaable shape (i.e. certainly not selinux) for each new hook addition. _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 17 2002 - 06:23:37 PDT