Re: [PATCH] make LSM register functions GPLonly exports

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanvat_private)
Date: Thu Oct 17 2002 - 11:03:55 PDT

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"

    On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 19:44, Crispin Cowan wrote:
    
    > Note that if we decide that #include of a kernel header file means that 
    > a work is derived, then we cause another problem: most Linux 
    > applications come under the GPL.  glibc #includes some kernel header 
    > files, and most Linux applications #include glibc headers, so most 
    > applications are #including kernel header files. If #include is the 
    > basis for declaring a module to be a derived work of the kernel, then 
    > there is some bad news coming for people who like to use Oracle and DB2 
    > on Linux ...
    > 
    difference is that glibc only uses the glibc-kernheaders; which on
    several distros at least are just the data structures and not the
    inlines. (and the inlines are in #ifdef KERNEL anyway and removed by the
    preprocessor for userspace)
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 17 2002 - 11:04:47 PDT