Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Thu Oct 17 2002 - 13:28:02 PDT

  • Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"

    On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
    >  With the current LSM setup of a 2^32 LSM calls, you can 
    > choose a number somewhat arbitarily and be fairly sure that it won't conflict 
    > and that you can later register the same number with the LSM people.
    You do not have to "register" a syscall number with the LSM people.  We
    don't care.  Use whatever you want for your sys_security call.  If you
    want to be nice, read the documentation and use a module id that is
    Personally I hate the "module id" idea, but that's just me...
    greg k-h
    linux-security-module mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 17 2002 - 13:29:21 PDT