On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:07:22PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > I would love to implement it in such a manner. Without using > self-modifying code, do you have any ideas of how this could be done? > > Yes, I agree it's a difficult problem. > > My main point is, don't compare the security bloat to USB, because in > the USB case if I don't use it I get no space/time consumption even if > I have it enabled (as a module). This is not true for the security > bits. Agreed, I shouldn't have made that comparison in the first place, sorry. Even if I do view the USB code as bloat at times... :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Oct 17 2002 - 15:20:35 PDT