Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

From: David S. Miller (davemat_private)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 00:57:35 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'"

       From: Crispin Cowan <crispinat_private>
       Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:00:34 -0700
    
       LSM is not zero-footprint, but it is as low as we could make it.
    
    I disagree, entirely.
    
    You could entirely hide a lot of this crap, especially the
    VFS stuff, by stacking in your own LSM specific VFS ops
    if we could stack filesystems or something like that.
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 18 2002 - 01:06:21 PDT