Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Next in thread: Andi Kleen: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

davemat_private

   From: Crispin Cowan <crispinat_private>
   Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:00:34 -0700

   LSM is not zero-footprint, but it is as low as we could make it.

I disagree, entirely.

You could entirely hide a lot of this crap, especially the
VFS stuff, by stacking in your own LSM specific VFS ops
if we could stack filesystems or something like that.
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module