Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'

Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'"
In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'"
Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'"
Reply: David Wagner: "Re: MARC: msg 'Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

davemat_private

   From: Crispin Cowan <crispinat_private>
   Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 01:23:56 -0700

   In light of that, we specifically set out to make the LSM interface 
   as small as possible.

You miss the point of my email completely.

If you had implemented a clean interface for the VFS
bits, you could do the LSM stuff with zero overhead.
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module