Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

Previous message: David Wagner: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
In reply to: Stephen Smalley: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Next in thread: Mike Wray: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> 
> > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
> > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
> 
> Yes, I think you've made your point.  Go ahead, remove sys_security.

Looks like we should remove this.  The interface is awkward, and there
are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design.  I know
SubDomain can get by without it.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module