Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

From: Chris Wright (chrisat_private)
Date: Fri Oct 18 2002 - 15:36:50 PDT

  • Next message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security"

    * Stephen Smalley (sdsat_private) wrote:
    > 
    > On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
    > 
    > > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
    > > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
    > 
    > Yes, I think you've made your point.  Go ahead, remove sys_security.
    
    Looks like we should remove this.  The interface is awkward, and there
    are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design.  I know
    SubDomain can get by without it.
    
    thanks,
    -chris
    -- 
    Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 18 2002 - 15:46:28 PDT