Re: insmod

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: Design scope of a security policy module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

chrisat_private

* Koichi ONOUE (koichiat_private) wrote:
> In reverse (capability -> owlsm) I try, but error. This reason 
> is same ? (capability module does not stack with the owlsm 
> module ?)

Yes.  Neither module implements the security_operations callbacks
(un)register_security().  Perhaps you could try David Wheeler's stacker
module <http://www.dwheeler.com/misc/stacker.c>.  It allows you to stack
multiple modules together.  In general, arbitrary modules could easily
have side effects that don't work well with one another.  It's always
prudent to verify the modules can play nicely together.

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module