Re: License go no go?

Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: Design scope of a security policy module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

visitorat_private

Hi,

sorry I didn't mean to be rude, my email was crippled since I upgraded to
 SuSE 8.1, so sorry about a late reply.

On Saturday 26 October 2002 19:24, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> IMHO, a pre-existing driver certainly strengthens your case that your
> code is not derived from Linux.
>
> But you are not out of the woods yet. As Greg pointed out, some of the
> aforementioned people have publicly promised to sue anyone who they
> think violates the GPL license on their code. So no matter how strong
> you think your case is, you may end up having to defend it in court.

Our views converge in that respect, it's costly to be in a lawsuit no matter
if you are wrong or right.

Thanks.

--
Peace can only come as a natural consequence
of universal enlightenment. -Dr. Nikola Tesla

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module