Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

From: Crispin Cowan (crispinat_private)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 00:17:54 PST

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"

    Greg KH wrote:
    
    >I'm _really_ tired of all of the "empty" functions that all security
    >modules need to provide.  So here's a brute force patch that lets any
    >security module only set the functions that it wants to override.  If
    >the function is NULL, then the "dummy" function will be used instead.
    >
    Sounds good to me. So you're just creating a default null function, and 
    then stuffing all the stubs with a pointer to that function?
    
    >Comments welcome (if there are none, I'll send it on to Linus.)
    >
    I suggest holding that post to Linus until Tuesday am. Lots of people 
    are likely taking a long weekend away from software, and won't see your 
    post until Monday morning.
    
    Thanks,
        Crispin
    
    -- 
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, WireX                      http://wirex.com/~crispin/
    Security Hardened Linux Distribution:       http://immunix.org
    Available for purchase: http://wirex.com/Products/Immunix/purchase.html
    			    Just say ".Nyet"
    
    
    
    

    _______________________________________________ linux-security-module mailing list linux-security-moduleat_private http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 00:19:20 PST