Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

From: Greg KH (gregat_private)
Date: Sun Dec 01 2002 - 12:05:35 PST

  • Next message: James Morris: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"

    On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 07:46:02PM +0100, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
    > 
    > If you want to check, wether a module has been recompiled, you should
    > add a length/sizeof(struct security_operations) parameter.
    
    No, I don't want to go down that path.  All security modules need to be
    compiled against the exact kernel version they are going to be used for,
    like any other kernel module type.
    
    thanks,
    
    greg k-h
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 11:06:26 PST