On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:00:27PM +1100, James Morris wrote: > Yes, but defaulting unspecified hooks to dummy operations could be > dangerous. A module might appear to compile and run perfectly well, but > be missing some important new hook. A -DDEBUG version that printk()s which hooks it is defaulting to the dummy ops might be the easiest way to get this result, short of checking the list of operations when recompiling a module... -- "A mouse can be just as dangerous as a bullet or a bomb." -- US Representative Lamar Smith (R-Texas)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Dec 01 2002 - 19:13:26 PST