Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

From: James Morris (jmorrisat_private)
Date: Tue Dec 03 2002 - 00:04:56 PST

  • Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions"

    On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:
    
    > Anyway, there's no way to resolve both this percieved problem, and the
    > "smaller and easier" patch that I proposed, right?  Unless we want to
    > export all dummy operation functions for all modules to use?  I could do
    > that, but it's pretty messy...
    
    Yeah, very.  I guess a security module could check the kernel version and
    print a warning to the effect "this module has not been verified with this
    kernel version" either at compile or runtime, if needed.
    
    
    - James
    -- 
    James Morris
    <jmorrisat_private>
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Dec 03 2002 - 00:06:28 PST