Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2

Previous message: Chris Wright: "Re: [patch] Convert remaining hooks to new format"
In reply to: Greg KH: "[RFC] LSM fix for stupid &quot;empty&quot; functions - take 2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

jmorrisat_private

On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Here's an updated version of the previous patch I sent out.  It
> incorporates all of the different changes people made.
> 
> If there aren't any objections, I'll be sending this out to Linus soon.

Looks good, with Chris' additions.  The hook verification issue I raised 
earlier is a non-issue: it might be useful, but can be addressed in other 
ways by module authors if needed without uglifying the mainline code.

Thanks for doing this work Greg.

- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorrisat_private>

_______________________________________________
linux-security-module mailing list
linux-security-moduleat_private
http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module