Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions - take 2

From: James Morris (jmorrisat_private)
Date: Wed Dec 04 2002 - 16:09:21 PST

  • Next message: James Morris: "Re: [patch] Convert remaining hooks to new format"

    On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:
    
    > Hi all,
    > 
    > Here's an updated version of the previous patch I sent out.  It
    > incorporates all of the different changes people made.
    > 
    > If there aren't any objections, I'll be sending this out to Linus soon.
    
    Looks good, with Chris' additions.  The hook verification issue I raised 
    earlier is a non-issue: it might be useful, but can be addressed in other 
    ways by module authors if needed without uglifying the mainline code.
    
    Thanks for doing this work Greg.
    
    
    - James
    -- 
    James Morris
    <jmorrisat_private>
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    linux-security-module mailing list
    linux-security-moduleat_private
    http://mail.wirex.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-security-module
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Dec 04 2002 - 16:10:28 PST